利用者:Akaniji/公共科学図書館
公共科学図書館[1](こうきょうかがくとしょかん、英:Public Library of Science; PLoS)。
URL | PLoS.org |
---|---|
言語 | English |
タイプ | Science |
営利性 | No |
開始 | 2001 |
現在の状態 | Online |
The Public Library of Science (PLoS) is a nonprofit open-access scientific publishing project aimed at creating a library of open access journals and other scientific literature under an open content license. It launched its first journal, PLoS Biology, in October 2003 and publishes seven journals, all peer reviewed, as of May 2009.
歴史
[編集]本図書館の活動は2000年に強烈な形で始まる。出版社に宛てて公開状を発表し、科学論文の発表後半年以内の無料公開を要求したのであるが、これに応じない出版社に対しては、研究者が一丸となって購読・投稿・編集等に参加しないボイコットを行うとする苛烈な内容であった。最終的に180ヶ国34000人の研究者の賛同を得たこの運動を受け、『PNAS』等各誌が無料公開に踏み切った…[2]。2003年10月には『PLoS Biology』を創刊し、マスメディアでも報じられるなど大きな反響を呼んだ[3]。
The Public Library of Science began in early 2001 as an online petition initiative by Patrick O. Brown, a biochemist at Stanford University, and Michael Eisen, a computational biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The petition called for all scientists to pledge that from September 2001 they would discontinue submission of papers to journals which did not make the full-text of their papers available to all, free and unfettered, either immediately or after a delay of several months. Some now do this immediately, as open access journals, such as the BioMed Central stable of journals, or after a six-month period from publication, as what are now known as delayed open access journals, and some after 6 months or less, such as the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Many others continue to rely on self-archiving.
Joined by Nobel Prize winner and former National Institutes of Health director Harold Varmus, the PLoS organizers next turned their attention to starting their own journal, along the lines of the UK-based BioMed Central, which has been publishing open-access scientific papers in the biological sciences in journals such as Genome Biology and the Journal of Biology since late 1999.
As a publishing company, the Public Library of Science began full operation on October 13, 2003, with the publication of a peer-reviewed print and online scientific journal entitled PLoS Biology, and has since launched seven more peer-reviewed journals. One, PLoS Clinical Trials, has since been merged into PLoS ONE. Following the merger, the company started the PLoS Hub for Clinical Trials to collect journal articles published in any PLoS journal and relating to clinical trials.
The PLoS journals are what it describes as "open access content"; all content is published under the Creative Commons "attribution" license (Lawrence Lessig, of Creative Commons, is also a member of the Advisory Board). The project states (quoting the Budapest Open Access Initiative) that: "The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited."
Business model
[編集]To fund the journal, PLoS charges a publication fee to be paid by the author or the author's employer or funder. In the United States, institutions such as the National Institutes of Health and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute have pledged that recipients of their grants will be allocated funds to cover such author charges. PLoS was launched with grants totalling US$13 million from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Sandler Family Supporting Foundation.[4] It still relies heavily on donations from foundations to cover the majority of its operating costs.
Impact
[編集]The initiatives of the Public Library of Science in the United States have initiated similar proposals in Europe, most notably the "Berlin Declaration" developed by the German Max Planck Society, which has also pledged grant support for author charges (see also the “Budapest Open Access Initiative”).
Publications
[編集]- PLoS Biology [1], ISSN 1544-9173; launched in 2003
- PLoS Medicine [2], ISSN 1549-1676; October 2004
- PLoS Computational Biology [3], ISSN 1553-7374; June 2005
- PLoS Genetics [4], ISSN 1553-7404; July 2005
- PLoS Pathogens [5], ISSN 1549-1676; September 2005
- PLoS Clinical Trials ISSN 1555-5887; May 2006, later merged into PLoS ONE
- PLoS ONE [6], ISSN 1817-101X; December 2006
- PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases [7], ISSN 1935-2735; October 2007
(all ISSNs are "EISSNs", for the electronic edition)
- PLoS Hub for Clinical Trials [8], third quarter 2007
- PLoS Currents [9], ISSN 2157-3999; August 2009[5]
脚注
[編集]- ^ 訳語は科学技術振興機構刊『情報管理』誌による。
- 科学技術振興機構、2010年「情報界のトピックス」『情報管理』52巻10号630ページ目、doi:10.1241/johokanri.52.627、JOI:JST.JSTAGE/johokanri/52.627。
- マーカム, ディアンナ、2007年「ワールド・デジタル・ライブラリーは実現するか」『情報管理』49巻10号554ページ目、doi:10.1241/johokanri.49.542、JOI:JST.JSTAGE/johokanri/49.542。
- ^ 時実象一、2004年「オープンアクセスの動向」『情報管理』47巻9号617・619ページ目、doi:10.1241/johokanri.47.616、JOI:JST.JSTAGE/johokanri/47.616。
- ^ 熊谷玲美、2004年「オープンアクセス出版」『情報管理』47巻1号33ページ目、doi:10.1241/johokanri.47.33、JOI:JST.JSTAGE/johokanri/47.33。
- ^ Declan Butler (June 2006). “Open-access journal hits rocky times”. Nature 441 (7096): 914. doi:10.1038/441914a. PMID 16791161 .
- ^ Welcome to PLoS Currents: Influenza
References
[編集]- Adam, David. "Scientists Take on the Publishers in an Experiment to Make Research Free to All" The Guardian, 6 October 2003.
- Albanese, Andrew. "Open Access Gains with PLoS Launch: Scientists Call for Cell Press Boycott; Harvard Balks on Big Deal." Library Journal, 15 November 2003, 18-19.
- Bernstein, Philip, Barbara Cohen, Catriona MacCallum, Hemai Parthasarathy, Mark Patterson, and V. Siegel. "PLOS Biology-We're Open" PLoS Biology 1, no.2 (2003): 3
- Brower, Vicki. "Public Library of Science Shifts Gears." EMBO Reports 2, no. 11 (2001): 972-973.
- Brown, Patrick O., Michael B. Eisen, and Harold E. Varmus. "Why PLoS Became a Publisher." PLoS Biology 1, no. 1 (2003): 1-2.
- Butler, Declan. "Public Library Set to Turn Publisher as Boycott Looms." Nature, 2 August 2001, 469.
- ———. "Scientific Publishing: Who Will Pay for Open Access?" Nature, 9 October 2003, 554-555.
- Case, Mary. "The Public Library of Science." ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 215 (2001): 4. http://www.arl.org/newsltr/215/plos.html
- Case, Mary M. "Public Access to Scientific Information: Are 22,700 Scientists Wrong?" College & Research Libraries News 62, no. 7 (2001): 706-709, 716. http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crlnews/backissues2001/julyaugust2/publicaccess.htm
- Cohen, Barbara. "PLoS Biology in Action." PLoS Biology 2, no. 1 (2004): 1. http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020025
- ———. "PLoS Medicine." PLoS Biology 2, no. 2 (2004): 139. http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0020063
- Doyle, Helen. "Public Library of Science (PLoS): Committed to Making the World's Scientific and Medical Literature A Public Resource." ASIDIC Newsletter, no. 87 (2004): 9-10. http://www.asidic.org/meetings/newsletters/spring2004.pdf
- Doyle, Helen J. "The Public Library of Science—Open Access from the Ground Up." College & Research Libraries News 65, no. 3 (2004): 134-136. http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crlnews/backissues2004/march04/publiclibraryscience.htm
- Eaton, Lynn. "'Free' Medical Publishing Venture Gets Under Way." BMJ, 4 January 2003, 11. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/326/7379/11/b
- Eisen, Michael. "Publish and Be Praised." The Guardian, 9 October 2003. http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/opinion/story/0,12981,1058578,00.html
- Foster, Andrea L. "Scientists Plan 2 Online Journals to Make Articles Available Free." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 10 January 2003, A29.
- Gallagher, Richard. "Will Walls Come Tumbling Down?" The Scientist 17, no. 5 (2003): 15.
- Kleiner, Kurt. "Free Online Journal Gives Sneak Preview." New Scientist, 19 August 2003, 18. http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994071
- Knight, Jonathan. "Journal Boycott Presses Demand for Free Access." Nature, 6 September 2001, 6.
- Malakoff, David. "Opening the Books on Open Access." Science Magazine, 24 October 2003, 550-554.
- Mantell, Katie. "Open-Access Journal Seeks to Cut Costs for Researchers." SciDev.Net, 15 January 2004. http://www.scidev.net/News/index.cfm?fuseaction=readNews&itemid=1194&language=1
- Mason, Betsy. "Cell Editor Joins PLoS." The Scientist, 13 January 2003. http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030113/05/
- ———. "New Open-Access Journals." The Scientist, 20 December 2002. http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20021220/06/
- McLaughlin, Andrew. "Senior Scientists Promise to Boycott Journals." The Scientist, 2 November 2000. http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20001102/03/
- Medeiros, Norm. "Of Budgets and Boycotts: The Battle over Open Access Publishing." OCLC Systems & Services 20, no. 1 (2004): 7-10.
- Mellman, Ira. "Setting Logical Priorities: A Boycott Is Not the Best Route to Free Exchange of Scientific Information." Nature, 26 April 2001, 1026.
- Ojala, Marydee. "Intro to Open Access: The Public Library of Science." EContent 26, no. 10 (2003): 11-12. http://www.econtentmag.com/Articles/ArticleReader.aspx?ArticleID=5552&Query=intro%20open
- Olsen, Florence. "Scholars Urge Boycott of Journals That Won't Join Free Archives." The Chronicle of Higher Education, 6 April 2001, A43.
- Peek, Robin. "Can Science and Nature Be Trumped?" Information Today 20, no. 2 (2003): 19, 50-51.
- ———. "The Future of the Public Library of Science." Information Today 19, no. 2 (2002): 28.
- ———. "The Scholarly Publisher as Midwife." Information Today 18, no. 7 (2001): 32.
- Pickering, Bobby. "Medical Journals to Get Open Access Rival." Information World Review, 21 May 2004. http://www.iwr.co.uk/iwreview/1155321
- Public Library of Science. "Open Letter to Scientific Publishers." (2001). http://www.plos.org/about/letter.html
- Reich, Margaret. "Peace, Love, and PLoS." The Physiologist 46, no. 4 (2003): 137, 139-141. http://www.the-aps.org/news/PloS.pdf
- Russo, Eugene. "New Adventures in Science Publishing." The Scientist 15, no. 21 (2001): 12.
- Schubert, Charlotte. "PLoS Snaps Up Cell Editor." Nature Medicine 9, no. 2 (2003): 154-155.
- Stankus, Tony. "The Public Library of Science Passes Its First Biology Test." Technicalities 23, no. 6 (2003): 4-5.
- Suber, Peter. "The Launch of PLoS Biology." SPARC Open Access Newsletter, no. 67 (2003). http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/11-02-03.htm#launch
- Thibodeau, Patricia L., and Carla J. Funk. "Quality Information for Improved Health." PLoS Biology 2, no. 2 (2004): 171-172. http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020048
- Twyman, Nick. "Launching PLoS Biology?Six Months in the Open." Serials 17, no. 2 (2004): 127-131.
- Velterop, Jan. "Vendor View." Information World Review, 1 December 2001. http://www.iwr.co.uk/iwreview/1150688
- Wadman, Meredith. "Publishers Challenged over Access to Papers." Nature, 29 March 2001, 502.
- Walgate, Robert. "PLoS Biology Launches." The Scientist, 10 October 2003. http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20031010/10/
See also
[編集]- arXiv e-print archive
- PubMed
- Open Archives Initiative
- Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, of which PLoS is a founding member