利用者‐会話:Torpilorul
Looking for help
[編集]I am an editor that unfortunately cannot speak Japanese. I look for a bilingual collaborator who can help me create Japanese versions of articles on the English Wikipedia, mostly related to warships and naval history in general. Will appreciate any help offered. Regards. 2017年9月7日 (木) 08:48 (UTC)
Please stop posting machine translations
[編集]Hello,
I saw the article that you posted on the Japanese Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the wording is a mess, and I could not understand your Japanese. When you created it, did you use machine translation? The quality of machine translations is usually very poor, and machine translations to Japanese are almost never useful. If you post articles with machine-translated Japanese to the Japanese Wikipedia, most of your translations will be deleted. They will still be deleted even if you post them many times. Please stop posting machine translations here.
When translating articles for the Japanese Wikipedia, you must also be careful to obey Wikipedia's content license, the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA 3.0). To fulfil this license, you must include the name of the original article and the timestamp of the revision that you are translating from in the edit summary box (the small white box underneath the edit window). If you don't do this, your article will be deleted.
If you continue to post machine translations, you will be blocked from editing. If you want to post in Japanese to the Japanese Wikipedia, please find a native Japanese speaker, or someone with near-native Japanese ability.
Thank you for only using manual translations. -- JapaneseA（会話） 2017年9月7日 (木) 08:35 (UTC)
- Do not worry. I always ask for help after I create a machine-translation. I am aware how poor and faulty the machine is, but even faulty as it is, if I do not do it, nobody else seems to will. So little care for the navies of countries that were not empires. Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年9月7日 (木) 08:39 (UTC)
- JapaneseA I need some translations from the English Wiki to the Japanese one, about Romanian Navy warships. Can you help me with that? If not, can you at least ask around and find someone to help me with this? I got...probably 3 relatively small articles, and a few paragraphs in need of translation.
- Sorry, I can not speak English very well. And I do not know well Romanian Navy warships. Please contact them if a help is needed about this matter. thank you.--JapaneseA（会話） 2017年9月11日 (月) 06:14 (UTC)
- It will have to do, thankyou very much. Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年9月11日 (月) 06:26 (UTC)
Deletion request: 「アミラル・ムルゲスク (機雷敷設艦/護衛駆逐艦)」
[編集]I will inform you that the article you wrote ( アミラル・ムルゲスク (機雷敷設艦/護衛駆逐艦) ) was discussed as copyright infringement (reprint from this site) about whether to delete the article. I (Licsak) confirmed the fact that you carried out reprimand acts, so I have to cast a deletion vote. --Licsak（会話） 2017年9月26日 (火) 20:05 (UTC)
- Feel free to delete it. I already created a new one, about her whole class, without copyright problems and with some improvements (アミラル・ムルゲスク級). If you'd like and you have the time, you can improve it and even add there from her English Wiki article. Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年9月26日 (火) 20:49 (UTC)
Stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages
[編集]Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing.--Unamu（会話） 2017年10月15日 (日) 10:37 (UTC)
- Unamu Please stop adding templates for problems that do not exist. If there is a problem, try solve it, don't add a template and wait for someone to do it for you. Don't attemtp deleting the article, try improving it instead. Let's build, not destroy. Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年10月15日 (日) 10:39 (UTC)
Hi there. The maintenance templates that Unamu is trying to add are RFP (request for page protection) and AfD (articles for deletion) templates, which indicate that a request to protect the page and a request to delete the page was created, respectively. No matter ones agree or disagrees to these requests, he/she is not allowed to remove the templates until the discussions in the requests are concluded. Expressing disagreement by removing the templates repeatedly gives a very bad impression and may result in blocks. I sincerely hope that you could cool down, and if you see fit, provide comments in the requests so a consensus can be reached.--ネイ（会話） 2017年10月15日 (日) 11:17 (UTC)
- ネイ First of all let me thankyou for at least providing some reason and explanation, it is much appreciated. After two hours of work, I woke up with two big fat templates calling for the deletion of my work, no explanation, no reason, nothing provided. I think you can see why I could not "cool down" earlier. I get it, I am not a native speaker, but I am doing my best to convey information in the only format I can work with, at least for the moment: lists. But let me tell you, it will most certainly amount to nothing. If in 1 month nothing happens, if the article is not deleted, I will revert to removing the templates. For it is not fair, for both the subject matter and my work, to keep those temps that can very likely deter readers and that have no purpose. It's not the deletion itself that bothers me - I can integrate the whole list as a sub-section of an existing article - it's the sudden and potentially long-term spoiling of my work with those templates. Oh, and the rudeness of providing no reason/explanation. Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年10月15日 (日) 17:34 (UTC)
- No worries - it will be removed as soon as the RFP and AfD requests are done. Now that you stopped removing the templates I believe protection will not be done. As for AfD, I must tell you that it really depends. Currently the article has a wrong name (the literal translation into English would be "Romanian Navy achievements (Second World War)") and I believe if it is moved to some translation of en:Romanian Navy during World War II it would be better. In any case, if the AfD is not closed after 1 month, please still do not remove the template (the administrator who closes the AfD will do that). So what currently can be done is either wait or put down a comment for the AfD. Or if you are not able to write in Japanese, you can still write it down here or at Wikipedia:Help for Non-Japanese Speakers - it is for this purpose that the page exists.--ネイ（会話） 2017年10月16日 (月) 15:03 (UTC)
- ネイ I am...80% sure it will not be deleted. It simply has a lot of reliable references and addresses a unique topic. And if it's not done in 1 month, then how much is it needed? It's shame to leave the article in that disgraceful limbo: not deleted but with those deterring deletion tags. Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年10月16日 (月) 20:17 (UTC)
- No worries - it will be removed as soon as the RFP and AfD requests are done. Now that you stopped removing the templates I believe protection will not be done. As for AfD, I must tell you that it really depends. Currently the article has a wrong name (the literal translation into English would be "Romanian Navy achievements (Second World War)") and I believe if it is moved to some translation of en:Romanian Navy during World War II it would be better. In any case, if the AfD is not closed after 1 month, please still do not remove the template (the administrator who closes the AfD will do that). So what currently can be done is either wait or put down a comment for the AfD. Or if you are not able to write in Japanese, you can still write it down here or at Wikipedia:Help for Non-Japanese Speakers - it is for this purpose that the page exists.--ネイ（会話） 2017年10月16日 (月) 15:03 (UTC)
- ネイ First of all let me thankyou for at least providing some reason and explanation, it is much appreciated. After two hours of work, I woke up with two big fat templates calling for the deletion of my work, no explanation, no reason, nothing provided. I think you can see why I could not "cool down" earlier. I get it, I am not a native speaker, but I am doing my best to convey information in the only format I can work with, at least for the moment: lists. But let me tell you, it will most certainly amount to nothing. If in 1 month nothing happens, if the article is not deleted, I will revert to removing the templates. For it is not fair, for both the subject matter and my work, to keep those temps that can very likely deter readers and that have no purpose. It's not the deletion itself that bothers me - I can integrate the whole list as a sub-section of an existing article - it's the sudden and potentially long-term spoiling of my work with those templates. Oh, and the rudeness of providing no reason/explanation. Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年10月15日 (日) 17:34 (UTC)
充分な言語能力無しに他言語版で活動しないでください
[編集]ここは日本語版ですので日本語を使用しますが、以下の文を読み、理解できないようであるならばそもそも貴方には日本語版で活動するだけの言語能力が身についていません。また返答は日本語でお願いします。機械翻訳による作文は一切受け付けませんのでそのつもりでお願いします。仮に私がウィキペディア英語版に行き、日本語で何を主張しようが相手にもされないでしょう。そういうことです。第一に貴方は機械翻訳をつぎはぎしたような編集を繰り返されていますが、こうした低質な記事編集の後始末はコミュニティの労力を著しく費やす行為です。日本語での作文能力が無いのならば編集は断念してください。第二に、貴方は自国の艦艇をどの記事にも登場させたいようですが（駆逐艦、水雷艇、潜水艦等）、そうした自国を称揚するかのような行為はPOVとして禁じられています。記事の主題にあった艦艇を選択し、無用に写真や項目を追加しないでください。あのような充分な記事内容を伴わない追加行為は単に記事の品質を低下させる行為でしかありません。第三に、以上の指摘事項に基づいて行なわれた第三者による編集を、何度も何度も差し戻さないでください。3RRに触れる行為です。以上です。--124.100.218.130 2017年10月17日 (火) 04:29 (UTC)
- I will return the answer in English, because that is what I know. All that I do, no one of you guys ever did before. I wouldn't do any of this, if I knew someone else would do it. You people treated the Romanian Navy of WW2, almost like it never existed. I am trying to provide it with the coverage it deserves, because you people can't seem to be bothered to do that, oh no, it's much more important to translate an English article of a random German ship, just because it was German. So if you want to blame, blame the ignorance. I am an effect, not a cause. Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年10月17日 (火) 04:40 (UTC)
- なぜ日本語で返答しないのですか？ できないからでしょう。そのような言語能力で日本語の作文を行えると思っているのですか？ またそのようにして作られた記事がどの程度の質を保持していると考えているのですか？ 貴方の作成した記事にはどれにも機械翻訳による間違いや、日本語のニュアンスを理解しないことによる誤解が幾つも含まれています。さらにまた、貴方の作成した艦艇記事には他ブログからの転載部分が含まれ、著作権侵害で訴えられる可能性も存在しています。仮にそうなった場合ウィキペディアの日本語版コミュニティにその責任がかかりますが、貴方はどうやってその責任を取るんですか？ お答えください。迷惑行為を自覚せずに他言語版で活動するようならば、遅かれ速かれお引き取り頂くことになるでしょう。以上です。--124.100.218.130 2017年10月17日 (火) 04:53 (UTC)
- That is not an excuse for violating Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Moreover, what you mention is simply Romanian POV. We have a policy WP:NPOV which does not allow this kind of arguments. If you cannot read Japanese, then please read the English version of it - I am sorry to say that you are in violation of it. Besides you were also in violation of WP:3RR - when there are edit wars you should discuss in, for example, the talk pages, instead of reverting endlessly. IPさんがお怒りなのはわかりますが、相手が日本語を読めないのがわかっているのに日本語の使用を堅持するのは、意思疎通を阻害してしまう以上あまりよろしくないのではないかと考えます。相手に編集を止めさせようとしているのであれば、それこそ英語で求めたほうが早いでしょう。--ネイ（会話） 2017年10月17日 (火) 05:00 (UTC)
- It's not my Romanian POV, I am not making this stuff up - there are dozens of sources in my articles, both Romanian and English, to verify what I say. You think I want all of this? I wouldn't even be here if you guys would do what is fair and right: treat the Romanian Navy accordingly. It's only about a dozen articles, not that big a deal to work, yet I find myself asking around like a street beggar for someone to translate even one of them. I am sorry for violating Wikipedia's policies, I was aware of them, but I figured this will get some attention to the topic, and hopefully persuade others to do things right. Hopefully...Brown Water Admiral（会話） 2017年10月17日 (火) 07:31 (UTC)